Is it possible to ever make a post about queer identities other than trans women without some joker claiming transmisogyny. Like do we have to preface every post about different types of oppression with "of course trans women have it worse but-" so we don't get harassed for talking about our own experiences. Like is this where we are now.
This is exactly what I was afraid of when I saw those posts floating around last night. This is exactly what the “danger” flashing lights in my head were going off about.
THIS IS A TERF RECRUITMENT POINT
I’ve sat on this ask all day because there is a lot of pressure on me in how I answer this because it’s a TERF recruitment point. I don’t know if the person who sent this ask is aware of that, but it is.
Because, at face value, I agree. No one should have to preface talking about their own experiences by acknowledging another group first.
BUT
This - people being shut down because they didn’t say “of course trans women have it worse but-” - is not a widespread issue. This happens occasionally. There are individual instances of it happening, like last night. But agreeing, at face value with the original statement is like agreeing with the statement “aces shouldn’t go around LGBT+/queer spaces bragging about how pure they are for not having sex”. Sure. And there are probably instances of tumblr posts you could pull of individuals doing this, but it isn’t the enormously widespread problem aphobes make it out to be.
Agreeing at face value with the first statement has their foot in the door, and that’s all it takes to go from “aces shouldn’t brag about their purity” to “maybe we shouldn’t include aces at all to protect our community” to “who else is invading our communities?” And there starts the radicalization. This is an example of how they target people within the LGBT+ community to gradually radicalize them.
AND
I have a (maybe not the healthiest, but it’s useful, so whatever) of trawling radfem tags to preemptively block any that I find before they can find me, because curate your own online experience and all that. Anyway, because of that, I see the trends in radfem talking points.
Right now? There’s a huge amount of “trans women are so mean to TMEs, they obviously don’t support you and we would support you more!” from radfems aimed at transmascs and other AFAB nonbinary people - people who don’t experience transmisogyny. And to get their targets to a point where they can believe that, they need to start somewhere.
And here is where that is. Find an instance of a transmasc being targeted by, in this case, an aphobe [x], but it could be by any of their indoctrination offshoots, by way of pulling out a false transmisogyny accusation that, in this case, was fabricated based on people putting words in other peoples’ mouths, and then other people coming in without the full context and so misinterpreting the situation [x], and then start worming in these more broad statements like this ask, which imply a much larger problem than there is, and there’s your starting point of radicalization.
BE CAREFUL, CHECK YOUR TARGETS
We should not be trying to talk to each other about issues between different communities within the LGBT+ community while framing it as though we are or should be hostile toward each other. We especially shouldn’t be talking about the issues between AMAB and AFAB trans people, or any different groups trans people can be separated out into, in that way. Ask yourself who you’re being prompted to be angry at and why. Ask yourself if they’re actually your enemy.







